As there is currently a campaign to save one version of this painting, and there's been a recent Claire Chats video on it, plus an 11-page report by Melanie V. Taylor, I thought it would be fun to test your knowledge of it. Good luck!
Elizabeth I Armada Portrait
Correct!
Wrong! It's Sir Francis Drake. His descendants are the Tyrwhitt-Drake family.
Correct! The Art Fund and Royal Museums Greenwich are collaborating in trying to save it.
Wrong! At Greenwich. The Art Fund and Royal Museums Greenwich are collaborating in trying to save it.
Correct!
Wrong! It's £10 million.
Correct! The Tyrwhitt-Drake family version, The Woburn Abbey version and the National Portrait Gallery version.
Wrong! There are 3: the Tyrwhitt-Drake family version, The Woburn Abbey version and the National Portrait Gallery version.
Correct! It has been cut down so the sides are missing.
Wrong! It's in a portrait/vertical format rather than landscape/horizontal. It has been cut down so the sides are missing.
Correct! It was once attributed to George Gower, but now all three paintings are attributed to "unknown artist" and all three are thought to be by different artists or workshops.
Wrong! The answer is "unknown artist". It was once attributed to George Gower, but now all three paintings are attributed to "unknown artist" and all three are thought to be by different artists or workshops.
Correct!
Wrong! It depicts the defeat of the Armada.
Correct! England was busy colonising the Americas at this time and this painting was painted one year after the birth of the first English child in the colonists' settlement of Virginia.
Wrong! It's the Americas. England was busy colonising the Americas at this time and this painting was painted one year after the birth of the first English child in the colonists' settlement of Virginia.
Correct! According to C J Cairns, it is "a symbol of the potential destructive nature of females" and Elizabeth's position, with her back to the image, could signify her rejection of its meaning.
Wrong! It's a mermaid. According to C J Cairns, it is "a symbol of the potential destructive nature of females" and Elizabeth's position, with her back to the image, could signify her rejection of its meaning.
Correct! Although she is depicted as much younger.
Wrong! She would have been 55, although she is depicted as much younger.
You can find out more about the painting in my Claire Chats video and Melanie's report.