The Tudor Society

10 October 1562 – Elizabeth I catches smallpox

elizabethatprayerOn 10th October 1562, twenty-nine year-old Queen Elizabeth I was taken ill at Hampton Court Palace, with what was thought to be a bad cold. However, the cold developed into a violent fever, and it became clear that the young queen actually had smallpox. Just seven days later, it was feared that the Queen would die. Fortunately, Elizabeth survived the disease and was not too badly scarred, although her friend Lady Mary Sidney, who nursed Elizabeth through the illness, was terribly disfigured by the disease. In his Memoir of Services, Mary's husband, Henry Sidney, recorded the effect nursing Elizabeth had on his wife:

"When I went to Newhaven [Le Havre] I lefte her a full faire Ladye in myne eye at least the fayerest, and when I retorned I found her as fowle a ladie as the smale pox could make her, which she did take by contynuall attendance of her majesties most precious person (sicke of the same disease) the skarres of which (to her resolute discomforte) ever syns hath don and doth remayne in her face, so as she lyveth solitairilie sicut Nicticorax in domicilio suo [like a night-raven in the house] more to my charge then if we had boorded together as we did before that evill accident happened."

It was while Elizabeth was recovering from the illness that she ordered her council to make Robert Dudley protector of the kingdom, and she made it clear that "as God was her witness nothing improper had ever passed between them."

Members can find out more about Elizabeth I's experience, other important people who caught it, and about the illness itself in my Claire Chats video talk.


Image: Elizabeth I at prayer, from the frontispiece of her personal prayer book, 1569, shared on

  • On This Day in Tudor History, Claire Ridgway.
  • A Viceroy’s Vindication? Sir Henry Sidney’s Memoir of Service in Ireland, 1556-78, ed. Ciaran Brady.
  • Queen Elizabeth I, J.E. Neale, Chicago Review Press; Reprint edition (August 30, 2005), p.121.

First things first ... get your FREE TRIAL in just a few steps...

Tick the "Email" box to give us permission to email you.

You can unsubscribe at any time by clicking the link in the footer of our emails. For information about our privacy practices, please visit our privacy page.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.


There are 34 comments Go To Comment

  1. John Phillipson /

    Very interesting

  2. Leslie /

    Poor Lady Mary Sidney, caring for Elizabeth while she was sick herself. Sounds like it really left her debilitated since I’m sure she was not able to rest.

    1. Claire Ridgway / Post Author

      Yes, it’s such a sad story. What a loyal servant though.

      1. LINDA FOX /

        yes, indeed ….

    2. Gloriana'sGirl /

      Mary Sidney wurde durch das Pflegen von Elizabeth erst krank. Sie hatte eine so enge Verbindung zu ihr, dass sie es auf sich genommen hat, selbst durch die Pocken entstellt zu werden.

  3. Ceri Creffield /

    Mary Sidney was Robert Dudley’s sister – there must have been a doubly strong bond because of that.

  4. RealTudorLady /

    Interesting and moving article. Poor Mary Sydney, what devotion. I saw in a program quite some time ago that Elizabeth I doctor had her wrapped up in lots of red linen as he believed that this would draw the heat and fever out and cure her. She did recover but did the thinking have some reason or was it luck? The modern experts had no idea but one thought that the strong colour may have had some affect, although what he had no idea. I am fascinated about the history of smallpox and when you think that we only found the vacation by accident, the cow dairy maids recovered from smallpox, so we made the vaccine from their blood. Mary Sydney took a great risk but one that was loving and from duty. She was lucky to survive, but what a terrible cost, her beauty and her desire for life or company gone. The letter is very moving. Thank you.

    1. Nicola Jayne Brown /

      Can you die from small pox

      1. Claire Ridgway / Post Author

        Not now, as it has been eradicated, but, yes, it was a killer.

  5. Diane Warsinski /

    So interesting and so moving. Did Mary Sydney ever have a special acknowledgement? Thankyou

    1. Claire Ridgway / Post Author

      No, I don’t believe so, she would have been seen as doing her duty to her queen.

      1. Susan /

        Isn’t it true that Queen Elizabeth thereafter would always break court protocol & go, herself, to see Lady Mary, rather than ordering Lady Mary to come to see her?

        1. Claire Ridgway / Post Author

          I’m not sure, perhaps so.

  6. Lola Blanche /

    I was under the impression that she lost her hair & never grew back.

    1. Claire Ridgway / Post Author

      I’ve never heard of her losing her hair. I expect it thinned as she grew older, like many women’s, but she was recorded as having her “hair about her face” when Essex strode into her chambers uninvited and before she was properly dressed and ready in late 1599.

      1. Sarah /

        In later years the Queen wore white lead make up on her face (up to an inch thick) to hide the scars left behind from the small pox. The lead from the make up she wore slowly poisoned her causing her hair and teeth to fall out. She also suffered from digestive problems, fatigue and memory loss.

        1. Jane /

          I think the stories of Elizabeth being heavily scarred are myths. All the biographies I have of Elizabeth that mention scarring say the scarring faded

  7. Rose Pendleton /

    Thank you. I enjoyed reading this. I am interested in Queen Elizabeth as I have just finished reading The Royal Diaries series by Kathryn Lasky if anyone is interested.

  8. Sharon /

    Rose: Read anything by Alison Weir and Sarah Griswold…..they are experts on the Tudors…both non-fiction and fiction. Brilliant.

    1. Aimee Robinson /

      Really!! That you for that rid-bit. I also have an interview in the court of Elizabeth the first … I know Shakespeare had Othello as a black English man.. but, what about black men in her court, or Asians? I only wonder because I have been watching the 2018 Mary Queen of Scots and Elizabeth the first… the newest movie.. and I see differences in both ladies courts than history has relayed…

      1. Aimee Robinson /

        That should say interest no interview…

        1. Aimee Robinson /

          It would make total sense with the moors going into Spain in 700AD and also the Ancient Romans had many African Roman soldiers… that most likely were in Britannia when the Romans first went there with Caesar and again under Nero…

      2. Adele /

        It’s unlikely there was the level of racial diversity the 2018 film portrays. Historical sources had no reason to hide interesting or remarkable information about courtiers, racism not being as developed then as it is now, as there were few people of obviously non European extraction spread throughout the nations of Britain. Courtiers often came to court through high birth, rank or service to the monarch. While there may well have been some people who were obviously not of European
        extraction, there would not have been many visible.
        Furthermore, Othello wasn’t a black English man, he was a North African Moor and the story was set in Venice.

  9. RealTudorLady /

    I heard years ago that her doctor wrapped her in red cloth for days and this had some role in her healing. A more natural explanation would be a genetic immunity marker in her DNA and that she was one of those who naturally recovered. Her father recovered from a mild version of smallpox but wasn’t marked. Her mother lived through the Sweat as did other Boleyn and Howard relatives. There is a new theory in epidemiology today that we lived through the plague and other killer diseases or rather our ancestors did and our genetic immunity built up over the generations and the gene to beat serious disease came with it. M cells I believe the documentary called them, but don’t quote me. I can always check. Anne Boleyn became inoculated against the Sweat and associated viral diseases but her cells were also strengthen and passed on to her daughter. Henry was of strong disposition as he overcame malaria, small pox, some weird kind of Tudor flu and tertiary fever, all killers. The theory is a combination of both markers that built up her parents immunity were passed on, her own immune system became strong and she could fight this off. Our ancestors who survived serious disease could pass on a strengthened immune system allowing later generations to defeat these killers. Of course a number of other factors also have to be considered, such as understanding of medical knowledge, cleanliness, inoculation and our environment. However, some diseases simply died out and the immune system theory is part of the reason. Elizabeth had good strong genes and was able to survive. It scarred her for life, unfortunately, but she lived on, under a mask of white paste and a red wig.

    Poor Mary Sidney, caring for Elizabeth, terribly marked, her beauty gone. She was a loyal lady.

    There was a political fallout soon after this illness. Catherine Grey, her cousin married without her permission and was imprisoned with her husband Edward Seymour. Part of the problem was that many saw Catherine as the heir to the throne, she was also the sister of the unfortunate but condemned traitor, Lady Jane Dudley and she was more Royal than Elizabeth, according to several supporters. Elizabeth had a dubious pedigree, because legally she was illegitimate. Henry’s marriage to her mother, Anne Boleyn, was doubtful according to her enemies and Catherine Grey was considered legitimate. This brush with death brought the succession sharply into focus and when you consider that this unsanctioned marriage by a member of the Royal family, without permission, it was alarming to Elizabeth. Elizabeth refused to relent and has been seen as cruel because of her reaction, but from her point of view and that of her advisers, this was treason.

    1. Aimee Robinson /

      That makes so much total sense… hummm wow, just to think it was just the way your DNA succumbed or not….

  10. merwin /

    very interesting never knew queen Elizabeth had small pox

  11. Tudor Rose /

    Actually, Elizabeth went to visit Mary Sydney At Hampton Court when she stayed there after the smallpox ordeal. Elizabeth saw her every day while she was there.

  12. Sam Hearn /

    Surprised no mention has been made of Sybil Penn, Lady of the Bed Chamber, who also nursed Elizabeth through the small pox and died of the disease on 6th November 1562. She was buried at the nearby village of Hampton and her ornate tomb with rhyming epitaph survives.

    Mary Sidney retired to live at London Stile her home in modern day Chiswick, close to Kew Bridge. Her brother, Robert Dudley, had a large house across the river at Kew. The cellars of this house are to be found under the 17th century house now called Kew Palace in Royal Botanic Gardens Kew.

    1. clare /

      Where did you get this information about Mary Dudley living at Stile! Do you have any links to back this up please as I am doing in in depth article on Mary Dudley and this is the first mention of Stile House? or any retirement, not as we know it. she went to Wales and then Ireland following smallpox and had further children so all this about her being retired from society is not true.

  13. Camille Costanzo /

    Wish we had known the history when visiting Kew Gardens A year ago!

    1. Tob Jizzle /

      Wow! How Unlucky!

  14. Denver /

    Oh wow! So sad to have smallpox!!!

  15. Julie Birney /

    What a horrific thing that Mary Queen of Scots had to indure!

  16. Pingback: Smallpox Vaccine Scars: Why Do They Happen? | Health Research Policy /

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 October 1562 – Elizabeth I catches smallpox

  • No products in the cart.