Our experts for January are Laura Loney and Ashley Risk who have done extensive research to determine who might be in the famous oval portrait once thought to be Katherine Howard... but is it really of her? This in-depth video explains who they truly think the sitter is.
- You are here :
- The Tudor Society
- /Expert Talks /
- Re-Identification of a Royal Tudor Portrait – Expert Talk
There are 9 comments Go To Comment
Leave a Reply Cancel Reply
Latest Content
- #OTD in Tudor history – 7 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 6 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 5 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 4 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 3 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 2 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 1 December
- #OTD in Tudor history – 30 November
- #OTD in Tudor history – 29 November
Categories
- Expert Talks (106)
- Feast Days (70)
- Friday Videos (380)
- Guest Articles (27)
- Magazines (94)
- Monday Martyrs (24)
- News (434)
- On this day (1,947)
- Places (52)
- Public (572)
- Quizzes (427)
- Resources (199)
- Audios (27)
- Battles and Rebellions (43)
- Daily Life (2)
- Documentaries (15)
- Expert answers (31)
- Family Trees (3)
- Primary Sources (54)
- Recommended Reading (15)
- This Week in History (427)
- Transcripts (80)
- Tudor People (280)
- Explorers (13)
- Martyrs (59)
- Monarchs (25)
- Six Wives (14)
- The King's Men (36)
- The Queen's Men (12)
- Tudor and Renaissance Artists and Composers (8)
- Tudor Churchmen (16)
- Tudor Men (70)
- Tudor Poets and Playwrights (24)
- Tudor Women (55)
- Tudor Times (51)
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
Very fascinating! Thank you for taking the time to explain your research. I see it in the eyes, but until you showed the graphic experiments, I didn’t see a real likeness, except the eyes. Now I do. And thanks for explaining the symbolism, too. Truly very interesting, and I hope too that a likeness of Catherine Howard can be found. Michelle t
Thank you for your kind words, Michelle! Looking forward to the chatroom discussion on Friday.
I can see it now! I am amazed. I hope we can find a portrait of Katherine Howard. Thats a shame.
Thank you, Theresa! I’m forever hoping that there is an attic full of Tudor portraits that someone will stumble across one day! Fingers crossed!
I enjoyed this presentation very much. Your research and conclusions made are worthy of consideration. I for one DO believe that the portrait IS of Anne of Cleves. I admit that I’m a huge fan of Anne of Cleves but that is not why I think it is of her. I’ve never thought that this portrait looked anything like a teenage Catherine Howard. So, I have always thought that it was more likely of Anne of Cleves – and definitely not any of King Henry VIII’s other wives. I found the symbolism most interesting too. Also references to Anne’s Book of Hours. Beautiful and fascinating.
“Thank you” both so much for this presentation. Great work!
I am so pleased you enjoyed it! Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and kind words. It made my day!
Thank you so much for sharing your beautiful research and so many lovely portraits of Anne and her family, her Book of Hours which you don’t see very often and the portraits of Kathryn Howard.
Your research, especially into the symbols and the graphic research is fascinating and makes a good case. For me the Hapsburg chin stands out and Cleves was a relation to the HRE royalty. I can see where there are similar things in the miniature portraits but I don’t see that Anna of Kleve would use the English dragon in her dress. The age of the ex KH portrait is problematic as everyone said Anna was fair and beautiful except Henry and his cronies who lied to get his annulment.
The KH portrait is of a much older woman. She is at least 29 or 30. Anne was 24. She was born in July 1515, not September as previously believed and there is a lot more German about her than her dress. Anna adopted English and French ways but her panels show she continued to see herself as German. There are a number of interesting symbols in the dress and lives and hairstyle of the wearer but I am not yet convinced this is Anne of Kleves.
I think you have the basis of ground breaking results which can be built upon by art experts and I am sure many will be examining this for many more years before its confirmed one way or another. Your work is astounding and very thought provoking. One day, hopefully we will identify the sitter and one of Anne Boleyn and Kathryn Howard.
The workshop of Hans Holbein 1540 to 1545 Portrait of a Young Woman has some historians convinced that this is Kathryn Howard. She certainly looks like a young woman of 17 with pouting lips about to be foisted into the bed of the ageing Henry Viii, somewhat reluctantly. I think they might be right.
Thanks again and thanks for answering our questions in the chat tonight.
Cheers
LynMarie RTL
Thank you for the compelling and painstaking research. we are lucky there are other paintings to compare the miniature with. As with Anne Boleyn I think it will be difficult to trace a picture of Catherine Howard but hope we will!
After 50+ years as a photographer, 20+ years spent editing, restoring, and identifying old photographs, and several years spent as a lead in selecting the US FBI’s facial recognition software, I have some degree of expertise in comparing and understanding facial features as well as in how that is done. My wife is also a professional portrait painter, and I’ve learned from her as well.
The fact that the miniature is Anne of Cleves seemed obvious to me a first blush. Those are her eyes, and that is her facial architecture. It isn’t hard to “see” the miniature rotated is the same as the full-on portrait of Anne. This all ignores the fact that the supposed Katherine Howard painting is hardly the face of someone who died in her teens. The research is impressive and compelling.